Sometimes when we do our training, we leave out a range of books and packs for trainees to look at during coffee and lunch breaks. One such book is Intensive Interaction: Theoretical perspectives (2012), and in it is a extremely well researched and referenced chapter on 'Intensive Interaction and its relationship with the trial of impairments in ASD' by teacher Lydia Swinton. It is still well worth a read, as the extracts below attest.
Intensive Interaction and its relationship with the trial of impairments in ASD by Lydia Swinton in Intensive Interaction: Theoretical perspectives (2012) Sage.
The author begins by acknowledging that people with ASD have ‘a range of individual differences’ and identifies ‘the vast complexity of trying to teach social skills [to people with ASD]’. She also succinctly relates a view that her experience ‘of the approaches used to teach individuals with ASD did not seem to incorporate any means of teaching these social skills or, if they did ... it was in a manner which seemed artificial and formulaic’.
The author applauds a recent ‘greater focus
in these [neurological and non-conscious] areas’ and states that ‘the findings
of neurological research are beginning to reflect the ‘gut feeling’ nature of
Intensive Interaction’. She goes on to add ‘practice that was initially led by
empathy and instinct is now being supported by neurological reality’.
The Fundamentals of Communication and what is taught/enhanced through the use of Intensive Interaction
Here Swinton
states that ‘The link between the outcomes of Intensive Interaction activities
and the potential impact of these outcomes upon the triad of impairments is not
in any way radical or improbable’. Instead, she states that
‘Intensive Interaction seems a logical and obvious approach to fostering and
developing communicative and social abilities in a learner-led, naturalistic
way’.
Intensive Interaction 'also addresses these issues with more depth and richness than any of the other currently used ASD approaches, focusing on areas of communicative development which are not often attended to by the more structured, teacher-led methods’. She goes on to state that Intensive Interaction ‘seems to be an approach refined to the complexity of the communication impairments’ experienced by people with ASD.
Intensive Interaction 'also addresses these issues with more depth and richness than any of the other currently used ASD approaches, focusing on areas of communicative development which are not often attended to by the more structured, teacher-led methods’. She goes on to state that Intensive Interaction ‘seems to be an approach refined to the complexity of the communication impairments’ experienced by people with ASD.
How the Fundamentals of Communication work alongside the triad
of impairments
In
this section Swinton explores some of the research into the use of Intensive
Interaction with people with ASD, and suggests that its usefulness lies in the
fact that with Intensive Interaction ‘the learner is enabled to have a
meaningful role within an interaction, without the pressure to communicate in a
‘typical’ way’. She then
focuses on the use of imitation, which she describes as ‘a starting point to
develop awareness of self and other' and ‘can increase eye contact,
gesture and touching in children with ASD, as long as it is child-led’.
According
to Swinton ‘initiation of communication’ is also important, and according to
the National Research Council ‘... interactive styles of teaching which
offer initiation of communication activities have more beneficial long-term
effects on the progress of children with ASD’. She then discusses the
Intensive Interaction principles of ‘viewing stereotypical behaviours as having
potentially communicative functions’, ‘tasklessness’ and ‘tuned-inness’,
seeing these aspects of Intensive Interaction practice as providing the learner
with ‘a customised, synchronised and fully sensitised communication experience ... providing a ‘good fit’ between the teachers input and the learners
needs’.
However,
the author offers a note of caution when stating that ‘while the
developmental, learner-led ethos of Intensive Interaction is frequently lauded,
it often does not seem to translate into general practices in services’ ... and
that the impact of Intensive Interaction in the ASD field ‘should be more
acutely realised than it currently is’.
Resolution
In
the final section Swinton compares Intensive Interaction with other
autism-specific approaches (TEACCH, CHAT, PECS) which she says ‘focus on a
rigid, highly structured way of teaching and assessing these very complex,
sophisticated and, at times, surprisingly diverse skills’ and ‘do not
even appear to address’ a learner’s social communication difficulties. In
contrast, according to Swinton, ‘Intensive Interaction allows the development
of the messy, jumbled and unique process of learning to communicate and
socialise, without placing demands or restrictions upon the learners’.
No comments:
Post a Comment